Dr. Axel Schmidt 34 Jahre Erfahrung

Dr. Axel Schmidt holds a doc­to­ra­te in human sci­en­ces and has a degree in busi­ness admi­nis­tra­ti­on and a degree in psy­cho­lo­gy. He began his care­er in 1994 as a Mar­ke­ting Sci­ence Exe­cu­ti­ve at BBDO in New York. In 1996 he moved to the BBDO in Düs­sel­dorf as Mar­ke­ting Sci­ence Mana­ger and Stra­te­gic Plan­ner, and from 1997 to 1999 he held a staff posi­ti­on at BBDO Ger­ma­ny Hol­ding, the lar­gest com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons com­pa­ny in Ger­ma­ny. Until 2020, Dr. Axel Schmidt pro­ject mana­ger and part­ner at the manage­ment con­sul­tancy Bat­ten & Com­pa­ny, which is part of BBDO Ger­ma­ny. Sin­ce 2010 Dr. Axel Schmidt works as an expert in fami­ly courts. In 2020 he publishes with Prof. em. Dr. Karl West­hoff (Uni­ver­si­ty of Dres­den) the volu­me “Inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry child wel­fa­re — empi­ri­cal results and instru­ments for legal prac­ti­ce in the case of sepa­ra­ti­on of par­ents” (with a fore­word by Prof. Dr. Bernd von Hein­tschel-Hein­egg, pre­si­ding judge of the Bava­ri­an Supre­me Court in reti­re­ment and chair­man Judge of the hig­her regio­nal court). In addi­ti­on, he works as a lec­tu­rer for the trai­ning of social pedago­gues at the Nie­der­rhein Uni­ver­si­ty of Appli­ed Sci­en­ces and publishes num­e­rous publi­ca­ti­ons on com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on and fami­ly court issues.


Interdisciplinary child welfare

Published by Axel Schmidt in The­ra­py

Schmidt, A. & West­hoff, K. (2020). Inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry child wel­fa­re: Empi­ri­cal results for legal prac­ti­ce in the case of sepa­ra­ti­on of par­ents. Baden-Baden: Nomos. With a fore­word by Prof. Dr. Bernd von Hein­tschel-Hein­egg (reti­red pre­si­ding judge of the Bava­ri­an Supre­me Court and reti­red pre­si­ding judge of the Munich Hig­her Regio­nal Court for Sta­te Security).

This volu­me clo­ses the gap bet­ween norms, juris­pru­den­ti­al inter­pre­ta­ti­ons and empi­ri­cal results from the human sci­en­ces that are capa­ble of rea­ching a con­sen­sus to con­cre­ti­se the inde­fi­ni­te legal con­cept of child wel­fa­re. The first part of the book pres­ents the legal basis and the judgments of the Fede­ral Con­sti­tu­tio­nal Court and the Fede­ral Court of Jus­ti­ce for the wel­fa­re of the child; they are the frame­work for the second, lar­ger part, which pres­ents the empi­ri­cal facts from the human sci­en­ces in a com­pre­hen­si­ble and well-struc­tu­red way. The nor­ma­ti­ve deter­mi­na­ti­on and case-rela­ted inter­pre­ta­ti­on of the child’s best inte­rests can only suc­ceed if know­ledge is used that rela­tes to the social rea­li­ty of the child, i.e. psy­cho­lo­gi­cal, edu­ca­tio­nal and socio­lo­gi­cal know­ledge. The human sci­en­ces pro­vi­de a value sys­tem that cor­re­sponds to the legal decis­i­on-making cri­te­ria and thus a yard­stick for asses­sing the best inte­rests of the child in indi­vi­du­al cases and pla­cing the decis­i­on-making on a fact-based basis. The human-sci­en­ti­fic con­tent pre­sen­ted here, which is used to fill the legal con­cept of the best inte­rests of the child, with­stands the legal point of view and can the­r­e­fo­re be used by lawy­ers in order to gua­ran­tee legal secu­ri­ty. This inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry approach of a human-sci­en­ti­fic com­men­ta­ry on the legal child wel­fa­re cri­te­ria can be made available as a working aid to the fol­lo­wing tar­get groups: fami­ly jud­ges, pro­ce­du­ral coun­se­lors, cont­act nur­ses, sup­ple­men­ta­ry carers, experts, media­tors, youth wel­fa­re offi­cers, lawy­ers, poli­ti­ci­ans, parents.



Latest posts

Yellow cornfield against a blue sky.

Ukraine — avert the impending famine

With your donations we deliver food to Kyiv.  Support Ukraine now and send food to those in need.  Help mitigate the effects of war and winter with your contribution.